We are not running a price list yet. We're learning how teams actually use the Procure-to-Pay suite, and we are taking on a small number of design partners while we do. Pricing will be set once we have evidence, not before.
There is no "starter" tier and no feature gating during beta. The platform is the platform; the suite is the suite. Either you have it or you don't.
Procure-to-Pay suite
All six domains. Budget, Procurement, Vendors, Contracts, Receiving, Payables.
Multi-entity, day one
Every business document carries a LegalEntity. No FX or intercompany at MVP, but coming.
Audit-grade trail
Every write audited. Cross-document transaction trails exportable as signed PDF + JSON.
Role-based access
6 system roles + custom roles. Department scoping. Permissions never granted directly.
Vendor portal
Anonymous magic-link RFQ responses, optional self-service account ladder.
Document-uniform substrate
Status lifecycle, audit, attachments, activity timeline on every document. No exceptions.
Design partners we're actively talking to.
NGOs with donor-funded programmes
You need strict per-funder allocation, line-level budget tracking, and an audit trail your auditor can actually use. The strictness model was built for you.
Multi-entity organizations outgrowing spreadsheets
You've hit the wall of tabbed workbooks and disconnected tools. You want approval chains, three-way match, and reporting that doesn't lie about cached aggregates — across every entity, in one place.
Independent operators who bill from vendor invoices
You don't want a process. You want a tool that doesn't make you invent one. Same engine, every gate relaxed — and it grows with you as more suites land.
Or spin up a tenant first and decide later, since the signup flow doesn't ask for a credit card.